2002
All months (191)
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2536
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2518
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2373
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2331
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2293 - 2313 - 2314
19/12/2002
Cause list number: 2292
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2221 - 2240
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2320
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2316 - 2335
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2300 - 2405
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2280
11/12/2002
Cause list number: 2247 - 2299
05/12/2002
Cause list number: 2522
05/12/2002
Cause list number: 2281
05/12/2002
Cause list number: 2271 - 2272 - 2274 - 2276
05/12/2002
Cause list number: 2265
05/12/2002
It is not discriminatory to empower the police to impose an immediate ban on a person from accessing a stadium as a security measure during football matches, even if they do not observe the traditional safeguards applicable to ordinary criminal sanctions.
Hooliganism / Police, powers / Security measure, ban from stadium / Security measure, imposition, safeguards / Penalty, nature.
Cause list number: 2249
Institutions - Armed forces, police forces and secret services - Police forces.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Scope - Non-litigious administrative proceedings.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Access to courts.
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2502
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2381
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2370
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2311
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2301
27/11/2002
The obligation for certain applicants for refugee status to register with a centre, where they receive assistance in kind, is not contrary to the constitutional rules concerning equality and non-discrimination ( Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution), taken together with the right to social welfare (Article 23 of the Constitution), because it ensures that assistance continues to be granted. Assistance in kind is one of the forms of social welfare provided for when Article 23 was included in the Constitution ("standstill" effect).Nor does this provision infringe the constitutional rules concerning equality and non-discrimination, taken together with Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 2 Protocol 4 ECHR and Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in view of the objectives of the law and the arrangements for registering with a centre.The provision does, however, disproportionately infringe the right to respect for family life (Article 22 of the Constitution and Article 8 ECHR), unless an exemption is made for applicants for refugee status who form a family with persons entitled to social welfare in Belgium or who have been authorised to reside there. The Court interpreted the law as being in keeping with the Constitution and dismissed the application to have it set aside, provided that to this interpretation is applied.
Foreigner, obligation to register with a centre / Exemption, condition / Social welfare, arrangements / Parliament, standstill obligation.
Cause list number: 2206
Sources - Techniques of review - Concept of constitutionality dependent on a specified interpretation.General Principles - Vested and/or acquired rights / Proportionality / Margin of appreciation.Fundamental Rights - General questions - Entitlement to rights - Foreigners - Refugees and applicants for refugee status.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Right to dignity / Freedom of movement / Rights of domicile and establishment / Right to family life.Fundamental Rights - Economic, social and cultural rights - Right to a sufficient standard of living.
27/11/2002
Cause list number: 2200 - 2261 - 2262
13/11/2002
Cause list number: 2513 - 2515
13/11/2002
Cause list number: 2318 - 2319
13/11/2002
Cause list number: 2291
13/11/2002
Cause list number: 2290
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2459
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2416
06/11/2002
The preference given to the paternal surname may be explained by the patriarchal concepts of the family and household that have long prevailed in society.Other systems could meet the objectives pursued in assigning a surname in today's society. This does not, however, constitute sufficient grounds for the existing system to be considered discriminatory.
Child, born out of wedlock, surname / Modern society, changing traditions.
Cause list number: 2383
General Principles - Margin of appreciation.Fundamental Rights - Equality - Criteria of distinction - Gender.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Right to family life - Descent. (Descent, lawful, child's name )
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2328 - 2378
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2283
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2279
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2243 - 2244
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2224
06/11/2002
The introduction of a system of administrative penalties (fines and bans from stadiums) for unruly, even reprehensible, behaviour at football matches, which may apply to minors, where the juvenile courts may, as a rule, adopt only certain specific measures in relation to minors, is contrary to the constitutional rules concerning equality and non-discrimination (Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution).
Hooliganism / Football / Minor, ban from stadium / Youth, protection / Penalty, administrative.
Cause list number: 2216
General Principles - Proportionality.Fundamental Rights - Equality - Criteria of distinction - Age.
06/11/2002
Cause list number: 2189 - 2190 - 2191 - 2194 - 2225
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2496
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2333
15/10/2002
In a state governed by the rule of law, the leaders are subject to the law. The oath of allegiance to the King and of obedience to the Constitution and the laws of the Belgian people must be understood as a solemn declaration of submission to the rules of the Belgian legal system. These rules make it possible to express a preference for a regime, but not to disregard the regime in force. The words "allegiance to the King" should be understood to imply recognition of the monarchy as an institution, which itself derives from the Constitution. These words have no significance other than that of a promise of allegiance to a constitutional system that a democracy has chosen.
Municipality, councillor, assumption of duties, condition / Oath, political allegiance / Constitutional system, allegiance.
Cause list number: 2308
General Principles - Republic/Monarchy / Rule of law / Loyalty to the State.Institutions - Federalism, regionalism and local self-government - Municipalities.Fundamental Rights - Equality - Criteria of distinction - Political opinions or affiliation.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Freedom of opinion.
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2286
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2267
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2246
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2209 - 2294
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2171
15/10/2002
Cause list number: 2223
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2454
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2451
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2257
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2234
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2210 - 2211 - 2212
09/10/2002
Cause list number: 2166
02/10/2002
Cause list number: 2404
25/09/2002
Cause list number: 2452
25/09/2002
Cause list number: 2309
25/09/2002
Cause list number: 2264
25/09/2002
Cause list number: 2233
18/09/2002
Cause list number: 2228 - 2229 - 2230 - 2232
18/09/2002
Cause list number: 2218
18/09/2002
Cause list number: 2213
18/09/2002
Cause list number: 2203
10/07/2002
The principle of equal access to the civil service and the principle whereby appointments are made in accordance with legal rules laid down beforehand in a general and objective manner form a corollary to the constitutional rules on equality and non-discrimination (Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution). The Arbitration Court suspended the challenged law since it was apparent from the particular circumstances in which the law had been adopted that the allegation of violation of these rules was well-founded, and since the facts submitted by the applicant demonstrated that the challenged law caused him serious prejudice that would be irrevocably difficult to redress, even were the law to be set aside, because he was losing a final opportunity for end-of-career promotion.
Law, suspension, reason / Prejudice, serious / Civil service, promotion.
Cause list number: 2404
Constitutional Justice - Effects - Determination of effects by the court.General Principles - Separation of powers / Certainty of the law.Institutions - Executive bodies - The civil service - Conditions of access.Fundamental Rights - Equality - Scope of application - Employment - In public law.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Access to courts.
10/07/2002
By granting Parliament the power (a) to determine in what cases criminal proceedings are possible and what form they should take, and (b) to adopt legislation under which a penalty may be prescribed and applied, Articles 12.2 and 14 of the Constitution assure to all citizens that no action will be punishable and no penalty imposed except under regulations adopted by a democratically elected deliberative assembly.However, these constitutional provisions do not preclude the granting by law, to judges responsible for its application, of an element of discretion provided such law satisfies the specific requirements of precision, clarity and predictability with which criminal laws must comply.A provision of the Criminal Code to the effect that criminal judges, on finding that an offence has been committed unintentionally both by an individual and by a legal entity, should convict only the party which has committed the more serious offence, is not contrary to the constitutional rules on equality and non-discrimination (Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution) in conjunction with the above-mentioned constitutional provisions and Articles 6 and 7 ECHR.
Legal person, criminal responsibility, act committed by a natural person / Crime, organised / Judge, discretion.
Cause list number: 2288 - 2296 - 2297
General Principles - Certainty of the law / Clarity and precision of legal provisions / Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege / Margin of appreciation.Institutions - Executive bodies - Liability - Legal liability - Criminal liability.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial.
10/07/2002
Cause list number: 2159
10/07/2002
Cause list number: 2150
10/07/2002
Cause list number: 2146
10/07/2002
Cause list number: 2141 - 2142 - 2143 - 2184
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2410
03/07/2002
It is not contrary to the constitutional principle of equality and non-discrimination ( Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution) that a lorry-driver, under legislation adopted in application of a European directive, be held jointly and severally liable in the event of non-payment of the regional Euro-tax-disc even where his/her employer cannot pay, although in principle workers are not liable under Belgian employment law for faults committed by their employers.
Regional Euro-tax-disc / Transport, international / Employment law See labour law / Liability, employer, employee.
Cause list number: 2201
Sources - Hierarchy - Hierarchy as between national and non-national sources - Community law and domestic law - Secondary Community legislation and domestic nonconstitutional instruments.Fundamental Rights - Equality - Criteria of distinction - Citizenship or nationality.
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2186
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2175
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2151
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2138
03/07/2002
Cause list number: 2126
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2392 - 2407
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2414
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2413
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2409
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2400
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2397
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2220
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2207
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2182
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2177
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2172 - 2173 - 2178 - 2195 - 2217
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2169
26/06/2002
Cause list number: 2149
19/06/2002
Cause list number: 2371 - 2372
19/06/2002
Cause list number: 2278
19/06/2002
Cause list number: 2238
19/06/2002
Cause list number: 2161 - 2199 - 2241
19/06/2002
Cause list number: 2112
12/06/2002
Cause list number: 2165 - 2196 - 2197 - 2198 - 2215
12/06/2002
Cause list number: 2160
12/06/2002
Cause list number: 2109
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2394
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2321
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2242
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2185
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2129
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2127
05/06/2002
Cause list number: 2114
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2337
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2326
08/05/2002
The Parliament disproportionately infringes the right to a fair hearing when it rules unconditionally and generally that documentary evidence declared void by an investigating court cannot be used in the criminal trial on the merits of the case, even as exonerating evidence.
Criminal procedure, invalid documents, use as exonerating evidence / Defence witness.
Cause list number: 2327
Constitutional Justice - Effects - Temporal effect - Retrospective effect (ex tunc).General Principles - Certainty of the law / Margin of appreciation.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial.
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2222
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2219
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2208
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2202
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2179
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2156
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2137
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2102 - 2103
08/05/2002
Cause list number: 2079
23/04/2002
Cause list number: 2330
23/04/2002
Cause list number: 2334 - 2339
23/04/2002
Cause list number: 2205
23/04/2002
Cause list number: 2098
23/04/2002
aws may apply retrospectively only when this is essential to the smooth functioning or continuity of the public service. If judicial proceedings are also affected, then only exceptional circumstances can justify retrospective application, which not only operates to the detriment of a specific group, but also undermines the legal guarantees provided for everyone.
Decree, legislative validation / Military, status / Retroactivity, law, exceptional circumstance / Res judicata.
Cause list number: 2094 - 2095 - 2096 - 2104 - 2105 - 2106
Constitutional Justice - Effects.Constitutional Justice - Effects - Influence on State organs.General Principles - Separation of powers / Certainty of the law / General interest.Institutions - Legislative bodies - Powers / Relations with judicial bodies.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Double degree of jurisdiction.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Non-retrospective effect of law.
23/04/2002
Cause list number: 2066 - 2068
18/04/2002
Cause list number: 2121
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2072 - 2193
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2323
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2192
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2187 - 2188
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2174
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2164
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2162
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2147
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2124
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2097 - 2133
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2089 - 2168
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2087
28/03/2002
Cause list number: 2048 - 2049 - 2158
28/03/2002
The law has discretionary power to waive the normal rules of criminal procedure, so that certain cases can be dealt with more rapidly under summary procedure before a criminal court judge. The Court must decide, however, whether the measures adopted for this purpose do not adversely affect the rights of the accused in a discriminatory manner.Article 6 ECHR applies to the preparatory phase of criminal proceedings.In leaving the law to decide when, and in what form, criminal proceedings may be brought, Article 12.2 of the Constitution guarantees that no one may be prosecuted, except under rules adopted by a democratically elected deliberative assembly. Delegation to another authority does not violate the principle of legality, provided that the powers of that authority are defined with sufficient clarity and concern the execution of measures, of which the essential features have been previously defined by law.
Crime, urban / Hooliganism / Police, custody, legality / Criminal procedure, immediate trial / Criminal procedure, preparatory phase, guarantees.
Cause list number: 2036
Constitutional Justice - Types of claim - Claim by a private body or individual - Non-profit-making corporate body.Constitutional Justice - Procedure - Parties - Locus standi.Constitutional Justice - Effects - Temporal effect - Limitation on retrospective effect.Sources - Categories - Written rules - International instruments - European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.Sources - Categories - Case-law - International case-law - European Court of Human Rights.Sources - Techniques of review - Concept of constitutionality dependent on a specified interpretation.General Principles - Certainty of the law / Clarity and precision of legal provisions / Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege / Proportionality / Margin of appreciation.Institutions - Executive bodies - Application of laws - Delegated rule-making powers.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Individual liberty - Deprivation of liberty - Detention pending trial.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial / Ne bis in idem.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Access to courts / Impartiality / Right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the case.
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2317
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2310
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2135
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2131
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2113
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2099
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2088 - 2134 - 2136
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2074
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2064 - 2085
13/03/2002
Cause list number: 2060
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2117
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2115 - 2116
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2067
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2062
20/02/2002
Making access to certain regulated professional activities conditional on managerial and professional skills is not incompatible with the Constitution or with international law. Disputes concerning compliance with these conditions can be submitted to the administrative courts, even if the right to exercise a professional activity on a self-employed basis is considered, as the European Court of Human Rights has consistently ruled, a civil right within the meaning of Article 6 ECHR.
Profession, access, condition / Trade, access, condition / Professional aptitude / Civil right, determination / Professional competence / Profession, authorisation.
Cause list number: 2059
Constitutional Justice - Jurisdiction - Scope of review.Sources - Categories - Written rules - International instruments - European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.Institutions - Judicial bodies - Administrative courts.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Access to courts / Double degree of jurisdiction.Fundamental Rights - Economic, social and cultural rights - Freedom to choose one's profession / Freedom to work for remuneration.
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2128
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2053
20/02/2002
Cause list number: 2041 - 2078 - 2157
13/02/2002
Cause list number: 2110 - 2111
13/02/2002
Cause list number: 2153 - 2154 - 2155
13/02/2002
Cause list number: 2148
13/02/2002
Cause list number: 2086
06/02/2002
Cause list number: 2273
06/02/2002
Cause list number: 2237
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2035
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2298
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2268
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2044 - 2045 - 2046 - 2047
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2031 - 2145
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2028
30/01/2002
Cause list number: 2027
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2263
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2118
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2052
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2051
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2050
23/01/2002
Cause list number: 2042
17/01/2002
Cause list number: 2248
17/01/2002
Cause list number: 2277
17/01/2002
Cause list number: 2251 - 2252 - 2253 - 2254 - 2255 - 2256 - 2258 - 2259 - 2260
17/01/2002
Cause list number: 2130 - 2140 - 2163 - 2170 - 2245
17/01/2002
Cause list number: 2054 - 2058 - 2069 - 2075 - 2081 - 2083 - 2084 - 2100
16/01/2002
Cause list number: 2119 - 2120
16/01/2002
Cause list number: 2093
16/01/2002
Cause list number: 2065
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2123
09/01/2002
A difference in treatment resulting from the application of different procedures before different courts in different circumstances is not, in itself, discriminatory. The principle of equality and non-discrimination (Articles 10 and 11 of the Constitution) is violated only if different treatment is accompanied by disproportionate restriction of the rights of the parties concerned.The right of access to a court, which is one aspect of the right to a fair trial, may be subject to conditions of admissibility, particularly in respect of time-limits for lodging appeals. However, such conditions must not restrict the right in a manner which affects its very substance.
Appeal, time-limit / Judgment in absentia, appeal, time-limit / Criminal procedure, guarantees.
Cause list number: 2108
Sources - Categories - Written rules - International instruments - European Convention on Human Rights of 1950.Sources - Categories - Case-law - International case-law - European Court of Human Rights.General Principles - Proportionality.Fundamental Rights - Equality.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial.Fundamental Rights - Civil and political rights - Procedural safeguards, rights of the defence and fair trial - Access to courts / Double degree of jurisdiction.
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2266
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2101
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2090
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2082
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2080
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2073
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2070
09/01/2002
Cause list number: 2026